Latest topics
Support Us!
Wierd question ya I know
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Wierd question ya I know
So if there were two twin girls and they met these to brothers then one of the couples got married could they still get married without it being like against the law?Cause if the first two couples get married then that would make the other couple by law brother and sister. So what happens?
JJwells- Top Poster
-
Post Count : 1502
Age : 32
Interests : Music, Hunting, Trapping, Internet, ect
Registration date : 2009-09-25
Re: Wierd question ya I know
Pretty sure that being brother and sister in law does not present any legal problems or relation issues. Even if they were to marry they would still remain as just that, brother and sister in law.
I think the only thing that makes it sound remotely weird is the title of brother and sister.
I think the only thing that makes it sound remotely weird is the title of brother and sister.
Re: Wierd question ya I know
Ya guess so ha idk its just been stewing over in my brain so I just wondered.
JJwells- Top Poster
-
Post Count : 1502
Age : 32
Interests : Music, Hunting, Trapping, Internet, ect
Registration date : 2009-09-25
Re: Wierd question ya I know
The other two twins wouldn't be brother and sister by law, so there isn't even an issue.
Here's an example: although, yes, my sister-in-law considers me her sister-in-law ever since she married my brother, it is because SHE married into MY family. Same applies the other way, my brother considers his wife's brother to be his brother-in-law because HE married into HER family. I obviously entered into neither of their families when they got married, so I did not gain any in-law siblings from their marriage.
The same thing applies in this situation. Although the other male twin is now the brother-in-law of the married female twin, it is only because the married female twin is now legally a part of the male twins' family. The other female twin is not part of the male twins' family and therefore is not related to them in any way.
Does this make sense? It's a very confusing thing to explain...
Here's an example: although, yes, my sister-in-law considers me her sister-in-law ever since she married my brother, it is because SHE married into MY family. Same applies the other way, my brother considers his wife's brother to be his brother-in-law because HE married into HER family. I obviously entered into neither of their families when they got married, so I did not gain any in-law siblings from their marriage.
The same thing applies in this situation. Although the other male twin is now the brother-in-law of the married female twin, it is only because the married female twin is now legally a part of the male twins' family. The other female twin is not part of the male twins' family and therefore is not related to them in any way.
Does this make sense? It's a very confusing thing to explain...
Molly- Member
-
Post Count : 47
Age : 34
Interests : Slowly but surely taking over the world.
Registration date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wierd question ya I know
AAAH ok then well cool stuff thankyou ha.
JJwells- Top Poster
-
Post Count : 1502
Age : 32
Interests : Music, Hunting, Trapping, Internet, ect
Registration date : 2009-09-25
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Mon May 30, 2011 8:52 pm by Timma1986
» Tim's Movie Review of the Day: 'Apocalypse Now' (1979)
Mon May 23, 2011 9:07 pm by Timma1986
» Tim's Movie Review of the Day: 'Almost Famous' (2000)
Tue May 17, 2011 6:54 pm by Timma1986
» AGGRON!
Sun May 15, 2011 8:25 pm by ZIMMER1994
» Anybody Collect Anything?
Thu May 05, 2011 11:04 pm by lakeg
» Tim's Movie Review of the Day: 'Shaun of the Dead' (2004)
Thu May 05, 2011 9:40 pm by Timma1986
» Original Riffs
Tue May 03, 2011 1:43 am by Cjanz
» Which 2011 sequel are you most excited for?
Mon May 02, 2011 9:26 pm by MasonK565
» RELEASE!
Mon May 02, 2011 9:24 pm by MasonK565